The usefulness of texture and color enhancement imaging to identify the minor papilla orifice.

In clinical cases of pancreas divisum, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography often necessitates cannulation of the pancreatic duct through the minor papilla. Nevertheless, this procedure can be challenging because of the small size of the minor papilla and the difficulty in visualizing the ductal orifice. A new image-enhanced endoscopy technique called texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) has been developed, which enhances texture, brightness, and color compared with white-light imaging, resulting in subtle differences in the surface mucosa. Herein, we describe the case of a 73-year-old man with pancreas divisum in whom TXI was useful in identifying the orifice of the minor papilla. He was referred to our hospital with repetitive acute exacerbation of chronic pancreatitis. Since contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a pancreatic stone in the main pancreatic duct, endoscopic retrograde cholangoepancreatography was performed as a therapeutic intervention. Despite the initial difficulty in identifying the orifice of the minor papilla on white-light imaging, TXI enhanced its visibility successfully, enabling dorsal pancreatic duct cannulation via the minor papilla. Subsequently, endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy was performed and a 6Fr plastic stent was placed. Post-endoscopic therapy, the patient's abdominal pain was relieved. TXI was useful in identifying the minor papilla orifice and led to successful cannulation.

Clinical course of small gastric subepithelial lesion less than 20 mm diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are treated as malignant gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs), and resection is recommended. However, small gastric SELs < 20 mm with no malignant features are monitored without histopathological examination, and the frequency of malignancy is unknown. This study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological findings and clinical course of gastric SELs < 20 mm measured by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with small gastric SELs < 20 mm diagnosed using EUS at a tertiary referral center between 2009 and 2021. The clinical course after diagnosis using EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was reviewed. RESULTS: Among 333 patients with small gastric SELs, 104 patients with 105 lesions underwent EUS-FNA. The pathological diagnosis was confirmed in 87 patients. GISTs were the most common pathology (47%). Among the 87 patients, 43 underwent therapeutic interventions, including tumor resection and chemotherapy. In groups of tumor resection, the pathological tumor size on the resected specimen was significantly larger than the size measured by EUS (19.5 mm vs 15.0 mm, P < 0.001), and 37% of resected SELs were 20 mm or over. No recurrence was observed after tumor resection during a mean follow-up period of 40 months. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 40% of small gastric SELs were malignant tumors, such as GIST, with most of them requiring treatment. Additionally, considering that the EUS measurement is 5 mm smaller than the pathological tumor diameter, further examinations, such as systematic EUS-FNA, may be required for SEL, including those smaller than 20 mm.

Novel 8-wire basket catheter is useful for endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones up to 10 mm: A multicenter prospective study.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Endoscopic treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones involves the use of basket or balloon catheters; however, what is the appropriate device remains controversial. In this study we aimed to prospectively evaluate the usefulness of a novel 8-wire helical basket (8WB) catheter made of Nitinol for the removal of CBD stones ≤10 mm. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter prospective trial. Patients with CBD stones ≤10 mm were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete stone removal within 10 min using the 8WB. The number of cases was determined using a previous study of stone removal by a conventional basket catheter as a historical control. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients were enrolled and 139 were ultimately included in the analysis. Patients with a single stone were the most common (84 cases, 60.4%), with a median maximum stone diameter of 5 mm. The median stone removal time using the 8WB was 6 min. The complete stone removal rate was 95.0% (132/139). Adverse events were observed in 14 patients (10.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The novel 8WB catheter is useful in the treatment of CBD stones ≤10 mm, presenting a high complete stone removal rate in this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCT1032200324.

Protocol for a Multi-Center Confirmatory Trial to Evaluate the Differential Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Using Perflubutane in Patients with a Pancreatic Mass: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

For pancreatic masses, an evaluation of their vascularity using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can help improve their characterization. This study was designed to evaluate the utility and safety of contrast-enhanced transabdominal ultrasonography (CE-TUS) and endoscopic ultrasonography (CE-EUS) in the diagnosis of pancreatic masses including solid or cystic masses. This multi-center comparative open-label superiority study is designed to compare Plain (P)-TUS/EUS alone with P-TUS/P-EUS plus CE-TUS/CE-EUS. Three hundred and one patients with a total of 232 solid pancreatic masses and 69 cystic masses were prospectively enrolled. The primary endpoints are to compare the diagnostic accuracy between P-TUS/P-EUS alone and P-TUS/P-EUS plus CE-TUS/CE-EUS for both the TUS and EUS of solid pancreatic masses, and to compare the diagnostic accuracy between P-EUS alone and P-EUS plus CE-EUS in cystic pancreatic masses. The secondary endpoints are to compare the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of P-TUS/P-EUS alone and P-TUS/P-EUS plus CE-TUS/CE-EUS for pancreatic solid/cystic masses, and the accuracy of P-TUS alone and P-TUS plus CE-TUS for pancreatic cystic masses. Other secondary endpoints included comparing the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CE-TUS, CE-EUS and CE-computed tomography (CT) for solid/cystic pancreatic masses. The safety, degree of effective enhancement, and diagnostic confidence obtained with CE-TUS/CE-EUS will also be assessed.

Novel peroral cholangioscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy for difficult stones.

Miwa and colleagues report on their experience with a newly developed peroral cholangioscope that is effective for the removal of difficult stones in the common bile duct and the cystic duct. The scope offers a large working channel and a high mobility bending section, increasing the efficacy of electrohydraulic lithotripsy.

Loop technique for guidewire manipulation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy.

Background and Aim: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is widely used in the management of biliary obstructions; however, literature on guidewire manipulation is lacking. This study aimed to assess the utility and optimal conditions of the loop technique for guidewire manipulation during EUS-HGS. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-HGS between April 2015 and January 2022 were included in this study. Patient characteristics and procedural details were retrospectively analyzed. Guidewire manipulations were classified as conventional technique or loop technique, based on the shape of the guidewire tip. Results: A total of 52 patients (Median age: 73 years, 38 male and 14 female) underwent EUS-HGS. The median guidewire insertion time was 49 s and the median overall procedure time was 20.5 min. The initial guidewire direction was toward the peripheral side in 23 patients (44%). Technical success rate of the EUS-HGS was 100%. Twenty patients (38%) underwent the procedure using the loop technique and 32 (62%) with the conventional technique. In the logistic regression analysis, an angle between the bile duct and needle of >70° was independently associated with use of the loop technique (OR 9.84; 95% CI: 2.24-43.13; P <0.01). Conclusion: This study revealed the utility of the loop technique in EUS-HGS. This technique is recommended if the bile duct is punctured at an angle >70°.

Effect of systemic inflammatory response on induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis on systemic inflammatory response in JCOG1106.

OBJECTIVE: JCOG1106, a randomized phase II trial conducted to compare chemoradiotherapy (S-1 concurrent radiotherapy) with (Arm B) or without (Arm A) induction chemotherapy using gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, showed a more favorable long-term survival in Arm A. This study was aimed at exploring whether some subgroups classified by the systemic inflammatory response might derive greater benefit from either treatment. METHODS: All subjects eligible for JCOG1106 were included in this analysis (n = 51/49 in Arm A/B). This exploratory subgroup analysis was performed by Cox regression analysis to investigate the impact of the systemic inflammatory response, as assessed based on the serum C-reactive protein, serum albumin (albumin), Glasgow Prognostic Score and derived neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, at the baseline on overall survival. P values <0.1 for the interaction were regarded as denoting significant association. RESULTS: Glasgow prognostic score showed significant treatment interactions for overall survival. Hazard ratios of Arm B to Arm A were 1.35 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-2.23) in the Glasgow Prognostic Score 0 (C-reactive protein ≤10 mg/L and albumin ≥35 g/L) (n = 44/34 in Arm A/B) and 0.59 (95% confidence interval, 0.24-1.50) in the Glasgow Prognostic Score 1/2 (C-reactive protein >10 mg/L and/or albumin <35 g/L) (n = 7/15) (P-interaction = 0.06). C-reactive protein alone and albumin alone also showed significant treatment interactions for overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Survival benefits of induction chemotherapy in chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer were observed in patients with elevated Glasgow Prognostic Score, high C-reactive protein and low albumin. These results suggest that systemic inflammatory response might be considered to apply induction chemotherapy preceding chemoradiotherapy.

A randomised phase II study of modified FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (JCOG1407).

AIM: We compared the efficacy of modified 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) with that of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS: Patients with untreated LAPC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive mFOLFIRINOX or GnP. One-year overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. The major secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) response, and adverse events. The sample size was 124 patients to select a more effective regimen with a minimum probability of 0.85 and to examine the null hypothesis of the 1-year OS <53%. RESULTS: Of the 126 patients enrolled from 29 institutions, 125 were deemed eligible. The 1-year OS was 77.4% (95% CI, 64.9-86.0) and 82.5% (95% CI, 70.7-89.9) in the mFOLFIRINOX and GnP arms, respectively. The median PFS was 11.2 (95% CI, 9.9-15.9) and 9.4 months (95% CI, 7.4-12.8) in the mFOLFIRINOX and GnP arms, respectively. The RR and CA19-9 response rate were 30.9% (95% CI, 19.1-44.8) and 57.1% (95% CI, 41.0-72.3) and 42.1% (95% CI 29.1-55.9) and 85.0% (95% CI, 70.2-94.3) in the mFOLFIRINOX and GnP arms, respectively. Grade 3-4 diarrhoea and anorexia were predominant in the mFOLFIRINOX arm. CONCLUSION: GnP was considered the candidate for a subsequent phase III trial because of its better RR, CA19-9 response, and mild gastrointestinal toxicities. Both regimens displayed higher efficacy in the 1-year survival than in the historical data of gemcitabine monotherapy.

Efficacy of chemotherapy for patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) is a rare variant of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The usual treatment for metastatic or recurrent PASC is systemic chemotherapy in accordance with the PDAC treatment strategy. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of chemotherapy, especially the benefit of recent combination therapies, in patients with metastatic or recurrent PASC. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of 116 patients with metastatic or recurrent PASC treated with first-line chemotherapy between April 2001 and December 2017 at 24 Japanese institutions. RESULTS: Combination chemotherapies included gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GnP, n = 28), fluorouracil/leucovorin + irinotecan + oxaliplatin (FFX, n = 10), gemcitabine + S-1 (GS, n = 10), and others (n = 9). Monotherapies included gemcitabine (n = 51) and S-1 (n = 8). The median overall survival (OS) was 6.5, 7.3, and 4.3 months for the whole cohort, the combination therapy group, and the monotherapy group, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that combination therapy showed a better trend in OS than monotherapy (hazard ratio = 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-1.20). GnP or FFX were selected in 58.7% of patients after FFX was approved in Japan, and revealed a median OS, median progression-free survival, and objective response rate of 7.3 months, 2.8 months, and 26.9% in GnP and 7.2 months, 2.3 months, and 20.0% in FFX respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that combination therapy may be more effective than monotherapy. GnP and FFX showed similar and clinically meaningful efficacy for patients with metastatic or recurrent PASC.

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Gemcitabine plus Nab-Paclitaxel versus Gemcitabine Alone in Older Adults with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) has been a standard treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer (uPC); however, the current treatment status and usefulness in older adults with uPC remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the patient background and compare the efficacy and safety of GnP versus other treatments in older adults with uPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we enrolled 233 eligible patients aged ≥76 years with pathologically proven, clinically uPC, and no history of chemotherapy from 55 Japanese centers during September 2018-September 2019. The main endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Geriatric assessments were performed upon registration and after 3 months. To adjust for confounders, we conducted propensity score-matched analyses. RESULTS: GnP, gemcitabine alone (Gem), best supportive care, and other therapies were administered to 116, 72, 16, and 29 patients, respectively. In the propensity score-matched analysis, 42 patients each were selected from the GnP and Gem groups. The median OS was longer in the GnP group than in the Gem group (12.2 vs. 9.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.37-1.13). The median PFS was significantly longer in the GnP group than in the Gem group (9.2 vs. 3.7 months; HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23-0.64). The incidence of severe adverse events was higher with GnP than with Gem; however, the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: GnP is more efficacious than Gem in patients aged ≥76 years with uPC despite demonstrating a higher incidence of severe adverse events.

Case reports: chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a rare subtype of malignant gallbladder tumor. Although surgical resection is the only potentially curative therapy for gallbladder NEC, most cases are surgically unresectable because of advanced stage disease and/or biologically aggressive behavior. The standard palliative treatment for malignant gallbladder tumors is chemotherapy; however, the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of gallbladder tumors is controversial. Here, we report a case of gallbladder NEC that showed a durable response to chemoradiotherapy. A 68-year-old Japanese man presented with a huge gallbladder tumor with liver and duodenal invasion. Pathological findings revealed poorly differentiated NEC of the gallbladder. After seven cycles of chemotherapy comprising cisplatin and irinotecan, computed tomography (CT) revealed remarkable tumor shrinkage, but an enlarged portal lymph node. The patient was treated with 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with two cycles of cisplatin and etoposide. After chemoradiotherapy, the enlarged lymph node also decreased in size. Maximum standardized uptake value of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/CT(FDG-PET/CT) changed from 8.2 to physiological accumulation. We defined this condition as a complete response on both enhanced CT and FDG-PET/CT; therefore, we did not perform systemic treatment and only observed his condition. This patient remained healthy with no recurrence at 3 years after chemoradiotherapy.

Combination Therapy With Lenvatinib and Radiofrequency Ablation for Patients With Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Up-To-Seven Criteria and Child-Pugh Class A Liver function: A Pilot Study.

Background: The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined lenvatinib (first-line systemic therapy) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma with beyond up-to-seven criteria and Child-Pugh Class A liver function (CP A B2-HCC). Methods: Twenty-two patients with CP A B2-HCC were enrolled in the study. The patients had no history of systemic treatment. For the initial lenvatinib administration in this study, all of the patients had an adequate course of treatment (no less than two weeks) and were administered the recommended dose. Of them, 13 were treated by means of lenvatinib monotherapy (monotherapy group), while the 9 patients with no contraindication to RFA operation and who had consented to RFA received initial lenvatinib plus subsequent RFA (combination group). The clinical outcomes that were considered to evaluate the treatments included tumor response, prognosis (recurrence and survivals), and possible adverse events (serum liver enzymes and clinically visible complications). Results: The combination group exhibited a higher object response rate (9/9, 100%) as best tumor response than the monotherapy group (10/13, 76.9%). Longer progression-free survival (PFS) (12.5 months) and overall survival (OS) (21.3) were demonstrated in the combination group than in the monotherapy group (PFS: 5.5 months; OS:17.1 months). The combination group achieved a higher PFS rate (1-year: 74.1%) and OS rate (2-year: 80%) than the monotherapy group (1-year PFS rate: 0%; 2-year OS rate: 25.6%; for PFS, p<0.001; for OS, p=0.022). The treatment strategy was the independent factor for PFS (HR: 18.215 for monotherapy, p =0.010), which was determined by Cox regression analysis, suggesting that a combination strategy may reduce tumor progression when compared to the use of lenvatinib alone. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences that were observed in terms of adverse events, with the exception of ALT elevation (p=0.007) in the combination group. Conclusion: Our newly proposed combination therapy may potentially be effective and safe for CP A B2-HCC beyond up-to-seven criteria. A larger scale, multicenter, prospective study is warranted to confirm our findings.

Novel clip device for prevention of bleeding after endoscopic papillectomy.

Objectives: Recently, a novel clip device, SureClip® (Micro-Tech Co. Ltd., Nanjing, China), has been developed, which improved rotation and reopening performance. We aimed to assess the efficacy of the SureClip® in prophylactic closure of the mucosal break after endoscopic papillectomy (EP) for ampullary neoplasm. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 40 patients who underwent EP for ampullary neoplasms between October 2009 and March 2020. Prophylactic closure after resection was performed using the conventional clip between 2014 and 2018, and with the SureClip® after 2019. The baseline characteristics, techniques, outcomes, and complications of EP were analyzed. Results: The median age of the patients (25 males and 15 females) was 70 years. The en block resection rate was 82.5% and the curative resection rate was 80.0%. Histologically, 11 (27.5%) patients had malignancy. Prophylactic closure was performed in 29 (72.5%) patients (17 conventional clips, 12 SureClip®). Complications occurred in 18 (45.0%) patients, including postprocedure bleeding in 9 (22.5%) patients. However, no postprocedure bleeding was observed in the patients who received prophylactic closure using the SureClip® (p = 0.038). All other factors were not significantly correlated with postprocedure bleeding. The duration of hospital stay after EP was significantly shorter in patients treated with the SureClip® compared to those treated with a conventional clip or without clips (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In the present study, prophylactic clipping of the mucosal break using the SureClip® was effective in preventing bleeding after EP.

Endoscopic duodenal stent placement versus gastrojejunostomy for unresectable pancreatic cancer patients with duodenal stenosis before introduction of initial chemotherapy (GASPACHO study): a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic duodenal stent placement is an alternative technique to gastrojejunostomy for gastric outlet obstruction due to pancreatic cancer. We compared the efficacy of endoscopic duodenal stent placement with that of gastrojejunostomy for treating patients with pancreatic cancer who are candidates for intensive combination chemotherapies as the first line of treatment. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 100 patients from 18 institutions in Japan. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) cytologically or histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, (2) good performance status, (3) gastric outlet obstruction scoring system score of 0-1 and (4) no history of treatment for pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the background characteristics of patients in the endoscopic duodenal stent placement (n = 57) and gastrojejunostomy (n = 43) groups. The median overall survival in the endoscopic duodenal stent placement and gastrojejunostomy groups was 5.9 and 6.0 months, respectively. Clinical success was achieved in 93 cases; the median time to food intake resumption was significantly shorter in the endoscopic duodenal stent placement group (median: 3 days, n = 54) than in the gastrojejunostomy group (median: 5 days, n = 43). Chemotherapy was introduced in 63% of the patients in both groups after endoscopic duodenal stent placement or gastrojejunostomy. Chemotherapy was started earlier in the endoscopic duodenal stent placement group (median: 14 days) than in the gastrojejunostomy (median: 32 days) group. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic duodenal stent placement showed similar or better clinical outcomes than gastrojejunostomy. Thus, it might be a promising option in patients with good performance status.